Re: Central Square
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2017 3:36 pm
Hmm. I'd imagine this is reserved for a more substantial development e.g. a tower of some sort.
It would be the signature building.
It would be the signature building.
neukreuz wrote:The main thing I took away from that video is how much presence and how good Capital Tower looks, especially when you consider some of the crud from that era (ie. Stadium House).
moyceyyy wrote:Hmm. I'd imagine this is reserved for a more substantial development e.g. a tower of some sort.
It would be the signature building.
Kyle wrote:moyceyyy wrote:Hmm. I'd imagine this is reserved for a more substantial development e.g. a tower of some sort.
It would be the signature building.
I'm not so sure. As well as space for 3,000 HMRC there's still a requirement for
the government hub, and it was thought central square had also won this.
However, I think it's a bit odd that JR Smart a ploughing on with number 4 and
number 3 Capital Quarter at the same time without tenants lined up (that we know of) so it
wouldn't shock me if the other big central government project is going there.
moyceyyy wrote:The build quality for One canal parade looks lovely. Wonder what went wrong with Central Square