I always felt that the controversy surrounding Guildford Crescent was more around the loss of thriving independent businesses than the loss of architecture. Obviously there would have been outcry at the loss of the crescent regardless, but I would imagine that if the buildings were empty/abandoned there would never have been protests.
Ash wrote:A better comparison is with Butetown where there was indeed a vigorous campaign to save the magnificent houses around Loudoun Square. Looked at from 2024, the conservationists in that case were undoubtedly right.
I also have to agree with this. Cardiff has been lucky with the lack of historic buildings that have been demolished over the decades, especially when compared to cities like Liverpool and Coventry (not that the average cardiffian appreciates this). But for me, the biggest loss probably is Loudoun Square and the surrounding streets of Butetown (including Bute Street).
Historic preservation can be frustrating at times but it is also extremely important. The difficult thing is working out what is worth saving and what isn't, and unfortunately that largely comes down to personal opinion. In many cases it is hindsight which makes it easier to judge wrongdoings, e.g. the Westgate Street Fire station which probably seemed an obvious thing to knock down when a (much needed at the time) multistory car park could be built to serve the city centre and stadium & a new fire station was needed anyway. Nowadays we curse this decision to knock down such a beautiful building which was replaced by a horrible multi story car park, but it probably made sense at the time.
I hope that in 10 years time we do not lament the demolition of Guildford Crescent.