Mon Feb 19, 2018 10:10 am
Simon__200 wrote:Well it *is* pretty obvious I suppose, but why can't the article name and shame? It's kind of ridiculous. Imagine, heaven forbid, that there was an incident and it turned out that news organisations had pointlessly, unilaterally decided to censor this information for some inexplicable reason.
I suppose it would be in the Hotel's interests (particularly around the 6 Nations) to prevent that information being in the public domain due to potential loss of earnings? Is it therefore possible that they have obtained some sort of court order preventing it being publicised?
Or perhaps the police don't legally need to name them because they're not a residential block of flats or apartments?
Not sure, clutching at straws here...
Some days you are the pigeon and some days you are the statue...